Skip to main content

Link – ‘On Future Thinking and Innovation: How Military Concept Writing can Unwittingly Suppress Innovation’ by Brigadier Chris Smith via Australian Army Journal

Click on the image to access the article

This article by Brigadier (BRIG) Chris Smith was first published in the Autumn 2018 Australian Army Journal. BRIG Smith examines military concept writing in terms of ‘explorative’ concepts (an abstract form) and ‘intentional’ concepts (a seminal form, describing or prescribing an intended way of waging wars). 

BRIG Smith’s article commences by detailing the differences between intentional and explorative concepts. He contends that militaries ought to be cautious about intentional writing because it may suppress ideas, and therefore hinder innovation, whereas explorative consequences overcome this weakness and promote innovation.

The article concludes by recommending an approach to modernisation where the Army seeks to overcome adversaries’ advantages through encouraging ideas and seeing where these innovations may lead, rather than a prescribing a blueprint for waging future wars.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *


Disclaimer
The Cove is a professional development site for the Australian Profession of Arms. The views expressed within individual blog posts and videos are those of the author, and do not reflect any official position or that of the author's employers' - see more here. Any concerns regarding this blog post, video or resource should be directed in the first instance to hello@cove.org.au.